There has been major changes in mysql and postgres over a couple of years. Mysql has been focusing on improving and optimizing innodb. Postgres on the other hand has been focusing on database replication and hot standby.

Recently postgres came out with version 9.0 which has built-in replication and hot standby - the two most requested feature in postgresql. Earlier people used to shy away from

My earlier post mysql versus postgresql brought me lots of negative comments - that i did not compare the transactional database of pgsql with the transactional engine (innodb) of mysql. The main reason why i did not do that was because i had found InnoDB to be very slow as compared to MyISAM.

But after all those comments i ran the benchmarks again using the same scripts and the same technology

Why? In brief, it is said that mysql is not as stable as postgresql. Postgresql or pgsql focuses on a single database engine as compared to mysql which has a pluggable engine architecture and has multiple engines. Also postgresql is well designed as compared to mysql. psql console is much better than mysql console (you will realize it when you use it). It is supposed to be much more scalable and