When an open source project becomes popular, bug reports start flocking in. This is both good and bad news for the project developers. The good news is that someone is using the product, and they are finding ways of breaking it that we didn't think of. The bad news is that most of the times the reporters assume that the developers have super human powers, and that they will find what's wrong by the simple mentioning that a given feature is not working as expected. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. An effective bug report should have enough information that the ones in charge will be able to reproduce it and examine in lab conditions to find the problem. When dealing with databases and database tools, there are several cases, from simple to complex. Let's cover them in order. Installation issuesThis is often a straightforward case of lack of functionality. When a tool does not install what it is supposed to, it is a show stopper, and a solution …

Have you ever seen BIG weird numbers in mk-query-digest report that just seem wrong? I have! Here’s one report I got today:

...
# Attribute          total     min     max     avg     95%  stddev  median
# ============     ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
# Exec time          5088s     1us    171s     2ms   467us   104ms    28us
# Lock time            76s       0      3s    26us    69us     3ms       0
# Rows sent          9.80M       0   1.05M    3.50    0.99  642.32       0
# Rows examine       5.59G       0  82.56M   2.00k    0.99  97.41k       0
# Rows affecte     457.30k       0   2.62k    0.16    0.99    1.68       0
# Rows read          2.16G       0  82.56M  788.53   21.45  82.91k    0.99
# Bytes sent         2.14T       0   4.00G 781.27k   3.52k  47.84M   84.10
# Merge passes     273.47G       0   4.00G  97.69k       0  10.35M       0
# Tmp tables …

When I announced the MySQL Council, I said that among its roles there is that of being a bridge between the MySQL community and Oracle.
It has come the time where we put this role to good use. Recently, there have been some concerns about the MySQL bugs database, which could be summarized in Mark Callaghan's post Where have the bugs gone?.
The gist of the concerns is that there has been a change in the bugs handling, although we don't know what was changed and how. In short, there has been a total lack of communication. The MySQL Council has addressed the concerns about the public bug database in a recent meeting, and has taken several steps, like approaching Oracle directly, and …

The MySQL general log is one of my favorite features for a quick debug. I especially like the ability of starting and stopping it on demand, which was introduced in MySQL 5.1.
However, using the general log has its drawbacks.
Today I was debugging a nasty bug that results from two statements that should be applied sequentially, but that were instead concurrent. These kind of problems are hard to cope with, as they are intermittent. Sometimes all goes well, and you get the expected result. And then, sometimes the statements fly on different directions and I stare at the screen, trying to understand where did they stray.
After some try-and-fail, I decided to enable the general log just before the offending statements, and to turn it down immediately after. Guess what? With the general log on, the test never failed. What was an intermittently …

Working with customer, I faced pretty nasty bug, which is actually not rare situation , but in this particular there are some lessons I would like to share.

The case is pretty much described in bug 55981, or
in pastebin.

Everything below is related to InnoDB-plugin/XtraDB, but not to regular InnoDB ( i.e in MySQL 5.0)

In short, if you use big BLOBS ( TEXT, MEDIUMBLOB, etc) (that allocated in external segment in InnoDB), you can get your database in trash state just executing update on row with blob and rolling back transaction twice ( on the same row)

The keywords that diagnose you hit this bug is

InnoDB: Serious error! InnoDB is trying to free page N
InnoDB: though it is already marked as free in the tablespace!
InnoDB: The tablespace free …

Once upon a time, there was a policy in MySQL not to add new features after the beta stage.
To my surprise, MySQL Workbench 5.2.30 introduces a new feature, the query formatter. I gave it a try. The results are not extremely encouraging. Granted, it's a plugin and not a feature in the core application, but nonetheless one would expect something more stable in a GA release, especially since the plugin features are displayed in the main menu, and unless you have read the announcement, you couldn't easily tell the core from the plugins.
This is what I have got in just a few minutes:

Bug #58356: beautify function fails on CREATE TABLE
Bug #58357: beutify function erases statement on CREATE …

Yesterday, I reached a happy milestone in HailDB development. All compiler warnings left in the api/ directory (the public interface to the database engine) are now either probable/possible bugs (that we need to look at closely) or are warnings due to unfinished code (that we should finish).

There’s still a bunch of compiler warnings that we’ve inherited (HailDB compiles with lots of warnings enabled) that we have to get through, but a lot will wait until after we update the core to be based on InnoDB 1.1.

Scenario
Recently came across this bug when trying out the federated storage engine for the first time in MySQL 5.1. Had a security table with user information on a remote server & database that needed to be joined to a local table housing site-specific permissions but only containing user IDs. I definitely wanted to use the “create server” method for the new table in case we later decided to link to a different table in the same remote database. A terrific little feature of the MySQL federated storage engine, to be sure.

Problem
The local server was the master in a replication pair. After executing the create server statement on the master, I proceeded to create the new federated table pointed to the new remote server. That’s when my mysql replication monitoring script alerted me that the replication thread had …

OUTER JOIN queries in SQL are susceptible to two very subtle bugs that I’ve observed a number of times in the real world. Daniel and I have been hammering out ways to automatically detect queries that suffer from these bugs, in a relatively new Maatkit tool called mk-query-advisor. It’s part of our series of advisor tools for MySQL. I wrote a blog post about it a while ago. Automated analysis of bad query patterns is a good thing to write tools to do, because catching buggy queries is hard work if you do it manually.

Let’s dive right in and analyze these subtle bugs. Warning: if you don’t understand how SQL handles NULL, you’re not going to understand the following. Many people have a hard time with NULL, which is why these bugs are so hard to …

The problem I am going to describe is likely to be around since the very beginning of MySQL, however unless you carefully analyse and profile your queries, it might easily go unnoticed. I used it as one of the examples in our talk given at phpDay.it conference last week to demonstrate some pitfalls one may hit when designing schemas and queries, but then I thought it could be a good idea to publish this on the blog as well.

To demonstrate the issue let’s use a typical example – a sales query. Our data is a tiny store directory consisting of three very simple tables:

PLAIN TEXT SQL:

1. CREATE TABLE `products` (
2.   `prd_id` int(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
3.   `prd_name` varchar(32) NOT NULL,
4.   PRIMARY KEY (`prd_id`),
5.   KEY …